If you read the following article you might be inclined to believe that - if you are over the age of 40 years old and tired, that you are suffering from Andropause. The reality however is that people who are purported sufferers could have any number of symptoms for other ailments; perhaps dietary or even a lack of exercise.
I am very sceptical of many of these labels which are adopted because of apparent "links". The problem with this research is that its steeped in empiricism. It is not science at all; its statistical correlation devoid of causation. Its the problem which arises from a misuse of the scientific method.
This problem is highlighted by the fact that this study discredits previous research. Who is to say that this research is any better. Is there any deductive analysis to disprove the old study, or is that just ignored. I'm very sceptical. Human ignorance abounds.
This is what happens when your hard-earned tax funds are expropriated to unconditionally support research, with no effective accountability. Its all a scam, with climate change and medical research backing pharmaceuticals the ultimate con.
------------------------------------------
Andrew Sheldon www.sheldonthinks.com
